<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Bloggers Blog - Latest Comments in MySpace Cuts 400 Jobs</title><link>http://bloggersblog.disqus.com/</link><description>blogging and social media news</description><atom:link href="https://bloggersblog.disqus.com/myspace_cuts_400_jobs/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Thu, 25 Jun 2009 07:41:33 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: MySpace Cuts 400 Jobs</title><link>http://www.bloggersblog.com/cgi-bin/bloggersblog.pl?bblog=618091#comment-11719206</link><description>&lt;p&gt;According to Google trends tools Facebook has surpassed MySpace in Feb 2009 web search volume in the US.&lt;br&gt;Globally MySpace has lost the race longer ago. Although not as popular in terms of search volume is Twitter another competitor making MySpace´s world harder. Yes, Twitter got its own challenges still ahead in terms of revenue and the general outlook, but I as a user got nowa days time to get into my facebook and email account when and then check some tweets,that´s it. MySpace-what for?got no time and see no added value!&lt;br&gt;At my company &lt;a href="http://www.activagers.com" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://www.activagers.com"&gt;http://www.activagers.com&lt;/a&gt; we focus on social network for young bby boomers-basta!Clear focus niche. Our members even argue about facebook being their target, too youngish they say. And MySpace? Some don´t even know exactly what it is, aside being social network. Laying off staff won´t do it. Maybe the whole newscorp idea wasn´t good at all,beside the casholas for the now ousted founders!&lt;br&gt;Wes&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Wes</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 25 Jun 2009 07:41:33 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: MySpace Cuts 400 Jobs</title><link>http://www.bloggersblog.com/cgi-bin/bloggersblog.pl?bblog=618091#comment-11554626</link><description>&lt;p&gt;MySpace needs to make a serious choice now to avoid becoming yesterday's social networking site. I think a focus on music is the way forward and I've explained what I'd do in a blog post that I wrote on Friday. And a little bit over the weekend. And this morning (it's a biggy).&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://clickingandscreaming.com/2009/06/22/how-music-could-save-myspace/" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://clickingandscreaming.com/2009/06/22/how-music-could-save-myspace/"&gt;http://clickingandscreaming...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I read somewhere that if MySpace can't run itself on 750 staff, it shouldn't be in business. I think I subscribe to that view - in order to succeed, MySpace must streamline. That means it should be easily operable on less staff, though that obviously ignores the human stories behind the redundancies.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Chris Nee</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 22 Jun 2009 09:28:18 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: MySpace Cuts 400 Jobs</title><link>http://www.bloggersblog.com/cgi-bin/bloggersblog.pl?bblog=618091#comment-11456602</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I agree that the job cut could be a result from the economy, but I also think that myspace is starting to become a has-been in the social networking world. It's certainly not there yet, but Facebook is beginning to acquire many of the same tools/options as myspace plus some, so there's certainly more wind under Facebook's wings. Myspace will only sink under water.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://beyondrace.com" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="beyondrace.com"&gt;beyondrace.com&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Matt</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 19 Jun 2009 13:33:07 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>